PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.00%
Revenue decline while ECL.AX shows 40.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2828.28%
Cost growth above 1.5x ECL.AX's 36.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-57.72%
Gross profit decline while ECL.AX shows 44.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-47.15%
Margin decline while ECL.AX shows 2.84% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-40.68%
G&A reduction while ECL.AX shows 51.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-415.16%
Marketing expense reduction while ECL.AX shows 5.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.83%
Operating expenses reduction while ECL.AX shows 38.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.88%
Total costs reduction while ECL.AX shows 37.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-48.15%
Interest expense reduction while ECL.AX shows 95.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.88%
D&A reduction while ECL.AX shows 28.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
219.28%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ECL.AX's 35.97%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
299.10%
EBITDA margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-544.67%
Operating income decline while ECL.AX shows 39.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-655.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
824.39%
Other expenses growth while ECL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
294.31%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x ECL.AX's 48.58%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
392.88%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x ECL.AX's 5.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
294.31%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x ECL.AX's 48.58%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
487.94%
Income change of 487.94% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
634.93%
Margin change of 634.93% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
234.62%
EPS change of 234.62% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
280.00%
Diluted EPS change of 280.00% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
74.90%
Share count reduction below 50% of ECL.AX's 0.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
58.90%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ECL.AX's 0.57%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.