PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
15.92%
Positive growth while ECL.AX shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.84%
Cost increase while ECL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
36.21%
Positive growth while ECL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
17.50%
Margin expansion while ECL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-9.08%
R&D reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-7.18%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
1.60%
Marketing expense growth while ECL.AX reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.69%
Operating expenses reduction while ECL.AX shows 55.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.27%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
62.25%
Interest expense growth while ECL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-48.53%
D&A reduction while ECL.AX shows 10.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
126.21%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x ECL.AX's 106.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
122.61%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x ECL.AX's 107.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
87.48%
Operating income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.20%
Operating margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
234.91%
Other expenses growth while ECL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
96.09%
Pre-tax income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.63%
Pre-tax margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.13%
Tax expense growth while ECL.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
91.33%
Similar net income growth to ECL.AX's 93.54%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
92.52%
Similar net margin growth to ECL.AX's 92.53%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
94.12%
Similar EPS growth to ECL.AX's 93.53%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
94.12%
Similar diluted EPS growth to ECL.AX's 93.53%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
10.11%
Share count change of 10.11% while ECL.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
10.11%
Diluted share change of 10.11% while ECL.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.