0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.91%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-2.68%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-5.14%
Gross profit decline while ECL.AX shows 5.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.27%
Margin decline while ECL.AX shows 7.03% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.79%
R&D reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
2.54%
G&A growth while ECL.AX reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-4.34%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.99%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.63%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.56%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-16.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-129.18%
EBITDA decline while ECL.AX shows 198.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-130.37%
EBITDA margin decline while ECL.AX shows 203.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-174.91%
Operating income decline while ECL.AX shows 230.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-186.11%
Operating margin decline while ECL.AX shows 236.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.13%
Other expenses growth while ECL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-501.03%
Pre-tax income decline while ECL.AX shows 202.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-525.51%
Pre-tax margin decline while ECL.AX shows 204.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.45%
Tax expense reduction while ECL.AX shows 11385.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-187.26%
Net income decline while ECL.AX shows 69.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-198.96%
Net margin decline while ECL.AX shows 69.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-300.00%
EPS decline while ECL.AX shows 70.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-300.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ECL.AX shows 70.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.