PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.48%
Similar revenue growth to ECL.AX's 12.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
6.23%
Cost growth 50-75% of ECL.AX's 10.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
18.99%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ECL.AX's 16.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
5.79%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ECL.AX's 2.89%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-94.74%
R&D reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
5.69%
G&A growth less than half of ECL.AX's 11.44%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
24.47%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ECL.AX's 2.13%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.72%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ECL.AX's 3.08%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.85%
Similar total costs growth to ECL.AX's 9.59%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-28.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-59.31%
D&A reduction while ECL.AX shows 30.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
118.70%
EBITDA growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
116.62%
EBITDA margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.35%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x ECL.AX's 30.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
73.64%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ECL.AX's 15.99%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1173.03%
Other expenses growth while ECL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
107.86%
Pre-tax income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
106.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
113.35%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x ECL.AX's 13.83%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
107.71%
Net income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
106.86%
Net margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
EPS growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.12%
Share count change of 82.12% while ECL.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
82.12%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of ECL.AX's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.