PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.95%
Revenue growth below 50% of ECL.AX's 7.74%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
18.10%
Similar cost growth to ECL.AX's 18.05%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-6.92%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.04%
R&D change of 100.04% while ECL.AX maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Marketing expense reduction while ECL.AX shows 4.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.08%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.01%
Total costs reduction while ECL.AX shows 11.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
D&A growth while ECL.AX reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-40.36%
EBITDA decline while ECL.AX shows 14.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.92%
EBITDA margin decline while ECL.AX shows 6.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.00%
Operating income decline while ECL.AX shows 20.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.54%
Operating margin decline while ECL.AX shows 11.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
206.20%
Other expenses growth while ECL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.64%
Pre-tax income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.65%
Pre-tax margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
458.58%
Tax expense growth while ECL.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
94.54%
Net income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.71%
Net margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
EPS growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.17%
Share count increase while ECL.AX reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.23%
Diluted share increase while ECL.AX reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.