PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
187.83%
Positive growth while ECL.AX shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
303.53%
Cost increase while ECL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
141.82%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x ECL.AX's 2.26%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-15.98%
Margin decline while ECL.AX shows 2.54% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.30%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ECL.AX's 2.81%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
148.60%
Total costs growth while ECL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.05%
D&A growth less than half of ECL.AX's 2555.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
733.71%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x ECL.AX's 34.96%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
189.66%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x ECL.AX's 35.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1131.48%
Operating income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
327.86%
Operating margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-77.19%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1597.50%
Pre-tax income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
489.77%
Pre-tax margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.33%
Tax expense growth while ECL.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
682.71%
Net income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
302.45%
Net margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
500.00%
EPS growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
500.00%
Diluted EPS growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.85%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.97%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.