PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while ECL.AX shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
257.86%
Cost growth of 257.86% while ECL.AX maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
-39.64%
Gross profit decline while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-69.82%
Margin decline while ECL.AX shows 0.00% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.49%
Total costs change of 113.49% while ECL.AX maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth while ECL.AX reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
46.36%
EBITDA growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-23.05%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.46%
Income change of 50.46% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-24.77%
Operating margin decline while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.83%
Other expenses reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
Income change of 100.00% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-0.00%
Pre-tax margin decline while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Tax expense change of 100.00% while ECL.AX maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
100.00%
Income change of 100.00% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.00%
Margin change of 0.00% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
133.33%
EPS change of 133.33% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
75.00%
Diluted EPS change of 75.00% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-4.47%
Share count reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
3.45%
Diluted share change of 3.45% while ECL.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.