PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-37.40%
Revenue decline while ECL.AX shows 24919.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-69.63%
Cost reduction while ECL.AX shows 2.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
129.53%
Similar gross profit growth to ECL.AX's 138.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
266.67%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x ECL.AX's 100.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
G&A growth while ECL.AX reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
104.96%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x ECL.AX's 28.42%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.84%
Operating expenses growth less than half of ECL.AX's 1038.06%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-42.89%
Total costs reduction while ECL.AX shows 7221.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-89.14%
D&A reduction while ECL.AX shows 13725.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-59.13%
EBITDA decline while ECL.AX shows 49.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.83%
EBITDA margin decline while ECL.AX shows 107.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
556.16%
Operating income growth below 50% of ECL.AX's 1832.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
948.22%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x ECL.AX's 106.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-37.78%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-41.00%
Pre-tax income decline while ECL.AX shows 1974.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.75%
Pre-tax margin decline while ECL.AX shows 107.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
77.61%
Tax expense growth less than half of ECL.AX's 1722.76%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-88.90%
Net income decline while ECL.AX shows 1996.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-82.26%
Net margin decline while ECL.AX shows 107.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
EPS decline while ECL.AX shows 2016.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Diluted EPS decline while ECL.AX shows 2016.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
306.15%
Share count increase while ECL.AX reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.27%
Diluted share increase while ECL.AX reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.