PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.40%
Positive growth while ECL.AX shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-34.50%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
313.44%
Positive growth while ECL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
252.15%
Similar margin change to ECL.AX's 269.98%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-6.68%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
62.19%
Marketing expense growth while ECL.AX reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.14%
Operating expenses growth while ECL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.45%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.19%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
129.78%
EBITDA growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1471.67%
EBITDA margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1367.46%
Operating income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1179.56%
Operating margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-261.46%
Other expenses reduction while ECL.AX shows 92.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
236.94%
Pre-tax income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
186.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-36.49%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
2002.95%
Net income growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1691.20%
Net margin growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
EPS growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
Diluted EPS growth while ECL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.23%
Share count reduction below 50% of ECL.AX's 0.02%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-17.11%
Diluted share reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.