PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-47.69%
Revenue decline while ECL.AX shows 10799.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-69.34%
Cost reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.48%
Gross profit growth below 50% of ECL.AX's 10799.78%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
92.09%
Margin change of 92.09% while ECL.AX shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.16%
G&A change of 41.16% while ECL.AX maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
103.68%
Marketing expense change of 103.68% while ECL.AX maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
179.46%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x ECL.AX's 55.70%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-45.77%
Total costs reduction while ECL.AX shows 55.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-67.74%
D&A reduction while ECL.AX shows 916.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-49.89%
EBITDA decline while ECL.AX shows 16013.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.24%
EBITDA margin decline while ECL.AX shows 246.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.14%
Operating income decline while ECL.AX shows 32358.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.85%
Operating margin decline while ECL.AX shows 197.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-948.97%
Other expenses reduction while ECL.AX shows 89.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-53.21%
Pre-tax income decline while ECL.AX shows 13879.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.54%
Pre-tax margin decline while ECL.AX shows 226.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.82%
Tax expense growth less than half of ECL.AX's 4210.19%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-64.13%
Net income decline while ECL.AX shows 849.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.96%
EPS decline while ECL.AX shows 847.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.96%
Diluted EPS decline while ECL.AX shows 852.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.58%
Share count reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.72% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.64%
Diluted share increase while ECL.AX reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.