PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.54%
Growth of 18.54% while ECL.AX shows flat revenue. Bruce Berkowitz would examine growth quality advantage.
-45.14%
Cost reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
870.69%
Growth of 870.69% while ECL.AX shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
750.14%
Margin change of 750.14% while ECL.AX shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.69%
G&A change of 22.69% while ECL.AX maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
86.91%
Marketing expense change of 86.91% while ECL.AX maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
85.43%
Operating expenses change of 85.43% while ECL.AX maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-24.99%
Total costs reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-74.14%
D&A reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
207.25%
EBITDA change of 207.25% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
187.88%
Margin change of 187.88% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
184.02%
Income change of 184.02% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
170.87%
Margin change of 170.87% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-226.40%
Other expenses reduction while ECL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
164.02%
Income change of 164.02% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
154.01%
Margin change of 154.01% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
263.07%
Tax expense change of 263.07% while ECL.AX maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
167.73%
Income change of 167.73% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
157.14%
Margin change of 157.14% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
166.67%
EPS change of 166.67% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
166.67%
Diluted EPS change of 166.67% while ECL.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
5.78%
Share count change of 5.78% while ECL.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
4.44%
Diluted share change of 4.44% while ECL.AX is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.