0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.00%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
2828.28%
Cost increase while LBL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-57.72%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-40.68%
G&A reduction while LBL.AX shows 23.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-415.16%
Marketing expense reduction while LBL.AX shows 33.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.83%
Operating expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 23.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.88%
Total costs reduction while LBL.AX shows 5.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-48.15%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.88%
D&A reduction while LBL.AX shows 174.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
219.28%
EBITDA growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
299.10%
EBITDA margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-544.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-655.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
824.39%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 10.83%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
294.31%
Pre-tax income growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
392.88%
Pre-tax margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
294.31%
Tax expense growth while LBL.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
487.94%
Net income growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
634.93%
Net margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
234.62%
EPS growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
280.00%
Diluted EPS growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.90%
Share count reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
58.90%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.