PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.10%
Positive growth while LBL.AX shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
21.60%
Cost increase while LBL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.36%
Positive growth while LBL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-7.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.46%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
5.14%
G&A growth less than half of LBL.AX's 23.61%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.42%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 23.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
32.31%
Total costs growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 5.64%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
130.23%
Interest expense growth while LBL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.27%
D&A growth less than half of LBL.AX's 174.89%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-224.28%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-184.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-128.87%
Other expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 10.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-101.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-77.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.90%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-109.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
24.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
24.12%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.