PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.26%
Revenue decline while LBL.AX shows 14.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.42%
Cost reduction while LBL.AX shows 18.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.12%
Gross profit decline while LBL.AX shows 10.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
137.94%
R&D growth less than half of LBL.AX's 325.25%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-16.63%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
14.83%
Marketing expense growth while LBL.AX reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.23%
Operating expenses growth less than half of LBL.AX's 174.88%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-9.20%
Total costs reduction while LBL.AX shows 28.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.80%
Interest expense reduction while LBL.AX shows 393.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-49.56%
D&A reduction while LBL.AX shows 30.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-952.72%
EBITDA decline while LBL.AX shows 67.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1203.88%
EBITDA margin decline while LBL.AX shows 45.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.81%
Operating income decline while LBL.AX shows 1.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-147.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-78.73%
Other expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 86.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-167.56%
Pre-tax income decline while LBL.AX shows 73.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-231.39%
Pre-tax margin decline while LBL.AX shows 51.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-168.18%
Tax expense reduction while LBL.AX shows 15.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-136.77%
Net income decline while LBL.AX shows 90.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-193.26%
Net margin decline while LBL.AX shows 66.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
EPS decline while LBL.AX shows 80.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.00%
Diluted EPS decline while LBL.AX shows 80.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.80%
Share count reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 3.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.80%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 3.21%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.