0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.95%
Positive growth while LBL.AX shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
18.10%
Cost increase while LBL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-6.92%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.04%
R&D growth while LBL.AX reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Marketing expense reduction while LBL.AX shows 33.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.08%
Operating expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 23.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.01%
Total costs reduction while LBL.AX shows 5.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
D&A growth less than half of LBL.AX's 174.89%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-40.36%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
206.20%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 10.83%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
5.64%
Pre-tax income growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.65%
Pre-tax margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
458.58%
Tax expense growth while LBL.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
94.54%
Net income growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.71%
Net margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
EPS growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.17%
Share count reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
37.23%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.