PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.39%
Positive growth while LBL.AX shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
69.72%
Cost increase while LBL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.26%
Positive growth while LBL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-10.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.16%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of LBL.AX's 23.16%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
26.55%
Total costs growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 5.64%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.46%
D&A growth less than half of LBL.AX's 174.89%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
0.32%
EBITDA growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-18.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3554.50%
Other expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 10.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
86.69%
Tax expense growth while LBL.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-45.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.74%
Share count reduction while LBL.AX shows 2.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.33%
Diluted share reduction while LBL.AX shows 2.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.