PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.32%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-20.95%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-14.32%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.39%
Margin expansion while LBL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
55.65%
R&D growth while LBL.AX reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 33.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Operating expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 23.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.60%
Total costs reduction while LBL.AX shows 5.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.17%
D&A growth less than half of LBL.AX's 174.89%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-76.91%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2563.31%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 10.83%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-74.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
151.05%
Tax expense growth while LBL.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-175.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-190.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-200.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-200.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.57%
Share count reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
13.52%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.