0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
187.83%
Positive growth while LBL.AX shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
303.53%
Cost increase while LBL.AX reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
141.82%
Positive growth while LBL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-15.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.30%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 23.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
148.60%
Total costs growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 5.64%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.05%
D&A growth less than half of LBL.AX's 174.89%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
733.71%
EBITDA growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
189.66%
EBITDA margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1131.48%
Operating income growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
327.86%
Operating margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-77.19%
Other expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 10.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1597.50%
Pre-tax income growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
489.77%
Pre-tax margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.33%
Tax expense growth while LBL.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
682.71%
Net income growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
302.45%
Net margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
500.00%
EPS growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
500.00%
Diluted EPS growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.85%
Share count reduction while LBL.AX shows 2.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.97%
Diluted share reduction while LBL.AX shows 2.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.