PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-37.40%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-69.63%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
129.53%
Positive growth while LBL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
266.67%
Margin expansion while LBL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x LBL.AX's 23.61%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
104.96%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 33.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.84%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 23.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-42.89%
Total costs reduction while LBL.AX shows 5.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-89.14%
D&A reduction while LBL.AX shows 174.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-59.13%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
556.16%
Operating income growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
948.22%
Operating margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-37.78%
Other expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 10.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-41.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
77.61%
Tax expense growth while LBL.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-88.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-82.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
306.15%
Share count reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
9.27%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.