PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.40%
Positive growth while LBL.AX shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-34.50%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
313.44%
Positive growth while LBL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
252.15%
Margin expansion while LBL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-6.68%
G&A reduction while LBL.AX shows 23.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
62.19%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 33.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.14%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 23.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-12.45%
Total costs reduction while LBL.AX shows 5.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-50.19%
D&A reduction while LBL.AX shows 174.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
129.78%
EBITDA growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1471.67%
EBITDA margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1367.46%
Operating income growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1179.56%
Operating margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-261.46%
Other expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 10.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
236.94%
Pre-tax income growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
186.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-36.49%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
2002.95%
Net income growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1691.20%
Net margin growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
EPS growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
Diluted EPS growth while LBL.AX declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.23%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x LBL.AX's 2.48%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-17.11%
Diluted share reduction while LBL.AX shows 2.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.