PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-47.69%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-69.34%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.48%
Positive growth while LBL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
92.09%
Margin expansion while LBL.AX shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.16%
G&A growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 23.61%. Michael Burry would check for operational inefficiency.
103.68%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 33.14%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
179.46%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 23.16%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-45.77%
Total costs reduction while LBL.AX shows 5.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-67.74%
D&A reduction while LBL.AX shows 174.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-49.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-948.97%
Other expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 10.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-53.21%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.82%
Tax expense growth while LBL.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-64.13%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.96%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.96%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.58%
Share count reduction while LBL.AX shows 2.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x LBL.AX's 2.48%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.