0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-41.24%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-37.57%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-44.89%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
30.99%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x LBL.AX's 23.61%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
-21.62%
Marketing expense reduction while LBL.AX shows 33.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.65%
Operating expenses reduction while LBL.AX shows 23.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-30.35%
Total costs reduction while LBL.AX shows 5.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
91.33%
D&A growth 50-75% of LBL.AX's 174.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
-59.47%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-86.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-77.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
134.95%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 10.83%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-74.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.52%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.31%
Tax expense growth while LBL.AX reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-69.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.93%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x LBL.AX's 2.48%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-2.64%
Diluted share reduction while LBL.AX shows 2.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.