PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.00%
Revenue decline while PLUG shows 5.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2828.28%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLUG's 89.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-57.72%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while PLUG shows 2.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-40.68%
G&A reduction while PLUG shows 19.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-415.16%
Marketing expense reduction while PLUG shows 298.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.83%
Operating expenses reduction while PLUG shows 5.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.88%
Total costs reduction while PLUG shows 16.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-48.15%
Interest expense reduction while PLUG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.88%
D&A reduction while PLUG shows 7.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
219.28%
EBITDA growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
299.10%
EBITDA margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-544.67%
Operating income decline while PLUG shows 7.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-655.84%
Operating margin decline while PLUG shows 11.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
824.39%
Other expenses growth while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
294.31%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 6.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
392.88%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 11.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
294.31%
Tax expense growth while PLUG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
487.94%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 6.83%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
634.93%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 11.38%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
234.62%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 20.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
280.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 20.30%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
74.90%
Share count reduction below 50% of PLUG's 16.85%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
58.90%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PLUG's 16.85%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.