PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-100.00%
Revenue decline while PLUG shows 12.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-100.00%
Cost reduction while PLUG shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Margin decline while PLUG shows 7.18% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while PLUG shows 25.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
100.00%
Similar marketing expense growth to PLUG's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while PLUG shows 15.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Total costs reduction while PLUG shows 13.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while PLUG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
D&A reduction while PLUG shows 0.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
100.00%
EBITDA growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
EBITDA margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Operating income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Operating margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
Pre-tax income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Pre-tax margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Tax expense reduction while PLUG shows 15.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
Net income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Net margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Share count reduction while PLUG shows 0.51% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.07%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 0.51%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.