PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.48%
Positive growth while PLUG shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.23%
Cost increase while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
18.99%
Positive growth while PLUG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.79%
Margin expansion while PLUG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-94.74%
R&D reduction while PLUG shows 4.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
5.69%
G&A change of 5.69% while PLUG maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
24.47%
Marketing expense change of 24.47% while PLUG maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.72%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLUG's 7.14%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.85%
Total costs growth while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-59.31%
D&A reduction while PLUG shows 4.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
118.70%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 8.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
116.62%
EBITDA margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.35%
Operating income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.64%
Operating margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1173.03%
Other expenses growth less than half of PLUG's 3791.07%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
107.86%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 6.77%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
106.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
113.35%
Tax expense change of 113.35% while PLUG maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
107.71%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 6.77%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
106.86%
Net margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 25.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 25.45%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
82.12%
Share count reduction below 50% of PLUG's 23.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
82.12%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PLUG's 23.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.