PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.00%
Positive growth while PLUG shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.32%
Cost increase while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.77%
Positive growth while PLUG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.23%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-5.29%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.50%
D&A reduction while PLUG shows 85.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
80.14%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 15.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
81.78%
EBITDA margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.69%
Operating income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.70%
Operating margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
98.33%
Other expenses growth while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
78.01%
Pre-tax income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.83%
Pre-tax margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-70.41%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
77.97%
Net income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.78%
Net margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.67%
Diluted EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.77%
Share count reduction below 50% of PLUG's 26.16%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
9.28%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 22.56%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.