PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
70.19%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 14.78%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
75.05%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLUG's 22.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
67.89%
Positive growth while PLUG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.07%
R&D growth above 1.5x PLUG's 17.58%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.44%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PLUG's 40.44%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
35.28%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 27.60%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.17%
D&A growth while PLUG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
435.90%
EBITDA growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
297.37%
EBITDA margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
387.16%
Operating income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
268.73%
Operating margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.11%
Other expenses growth while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
346.47%
Pre-tax income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
244.82%
Pre-tax margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1380.18%
Tax expense growth while PLUG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
329.78%
Net income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
235.01%
Net margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
300.00%
EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
300.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.29%
Share count reduction below 50% of PLUG's 6.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
41.42%
Diluted share increase while PLUG reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.