PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.95%
Positive growth while PLUG shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
18.10%
Cost increase while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-6.92%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.80%
Margin decline while PLUG shows 15.61% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
100.04%
R&D growth while PLUG reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-200.00%
Marketing expense reduction while PLUG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.08%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.01%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
D&A growth less than half of PLUG's 38.39%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-40.36%
EBITDA decline while PLUG shows 20.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.92%
EBITDA margin decline while PLUG shows 7.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.00%
Operating income decline while PLUG shows 0.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
206.20%
Other expenses growth while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.64%
Pre-tax income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.65%
Pre-tax margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
458.58%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PLUG's 74.92%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
94.54%
Net income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.71%
Net margin growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.17%
Share count reduction below 50% of PLUG's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
37.23%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PLUG's 0.05%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.