PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
110.57%
Positive growth while PLUG shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
402.59%
Cost increase while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-58.43%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.26%
Margin decline while PLUG shows 11181.10% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.50%
Operating expenses reduction while PLUG shows 82.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
128.66%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLUG's 14.60%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
917.31%
D&A growth above 1.5x PLUG's 26.61%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
205.31%
EBITDA growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.08%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PLUG's 674.23%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
61.64%
Operating income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-23.24%
Operating margin decline while PLUG shows 677.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-69.54%
Other expenses reduction while PLUG shows 72.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
Pre-tax income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.02%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLUG shows 455.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while PLUG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
Net income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.02%
Net margin decline while PLUG shows 508.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
100.00%
EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.41%
Share count reduction while PLUG shows 14.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
6.04%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 14.65%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.