PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
100.00%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 73.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
334.38%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLUG's 95.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-27.20%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.60%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while PLUG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense change of 100.00% while PLUG maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.07%
Operating expenses reduction while PLUG shows 41.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
122.65%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLUG's 79.79%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
65.78%
Interest expense growth while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
D&A growth while PLUG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.45%
EBITDA growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-56.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-73.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-175.68%
Other expenses reduction while PLUG shows 19.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
Pre-tax income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while PLUG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
Net income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.26%
Share count reduction while PLUG shows 10.43% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-7.26%
Diluted share reduction while PLUG shows 10.43% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.