PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
100.00%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 7.43%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
314.51%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLUG's 4.30%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-45.66%
Gross profit decline while PLUG shows 8.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-72.83%
Margin decline while PLUG shows 14.51% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
G&A reduction while PLUG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-36.49%
Marketing expense reduction while PLUG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.62%
Operating expenses reduction while PLUG shows 17.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
120.56%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLUG's 9.27%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 68.65%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-0.00%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.70%
EBITDA margin decline while PLUG shows 1.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-96.21%
Operating margin decline while PLUG shows 1.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
213.19%
Other expenses growth while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
Pre-tax income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Tax expense growth less than half of PLUG's 202.17%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
100.00%
Net income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
200.00%
EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.52%
Share count reduction below 50% of PLUG's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.52%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PLUG's 0.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.