PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-47.69%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-69.34%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
0.48%
Positive growth while PLUG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
92.09%
Margin expansion while PLUG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.16%
G&A change of 41.16% while PLUG maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
103.68%
Marketing expense change of 103.68% while PLUG maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while PLUG shows 157.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
179.46%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PLUG's 4.30%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-45.77%
Total costs reduction while PLUG shows 0.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while PLUG shows 4.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-67.74%
D&A reduction while PLUG shows 28.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-49.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-948.97%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-53.21%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.82%
Tax expense growth while PLUG reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-64.13%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.96%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.96%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.58%
Share count reduction while PLUG shows 0.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PLUG's 0.24%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.