PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
100.00%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 11.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
232.03%
Cost growth above 1.5x PLUG's 32.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.33%
Positive growth while PLUG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-44.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.13%
Marketing expense reduction while PLUG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.48%
Operating expenses reduction while PLUG shows 4.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PLUG's 24.10%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
331.75%
D&A growth while PLUG reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
90.40%
EBITDA growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
78.01%
Operating income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
97.28%
Other expenses growth while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
Pre-tax income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Tax expense growth 1.1-1.25x PLUG's 90.53%. Bill Ackman would demand explanation.
100.00%
Net income growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PLUG declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.88%
Share count reduction below 50% of PLUG's 1.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.61%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PLUG's 1.11%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.