0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-82.06%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-89.91%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-66.00%
Gross profit decline while PLUG shows 28.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
89.45%
Margin expansion while PLUG shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
15.12%
G&A change of 15.12% while PLUG maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-3.19%
Marketing expense reduction while PLUG shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
35.54%
Operating expenses growth while PLUG reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-71.07%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-40.62%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-115.52%
EBITDA decline while PLUG shows 56.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-187.42%
EBITDA margin decline while PLUG shows 20.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-123.40%
Operating income decline while PLUG shows 28.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-230.42%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-97.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-124.75%
Pre-tax income decline while PLUG shows 54.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-237.93%
Pre-tax margin decline while PLUG shows 15.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.13%
Tax expense reduction while PLUG shows 136.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-139.08%
Net income decline while PLUG shows 53.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-317.76%
Net margin decline while PLUG shows 14.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.00%
EPS decline while PLUG shows 56.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-142.11%
Diluted EPS decline while PLUG shows 56.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.85%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PLUG's 5.79%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while PLUG shows 5.79% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.