PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-44.75%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.75%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 22.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.68%
Interest expense growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.19%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
87.11%
Similar EBITDA growth to SLDP's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
238.67%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
282.29%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
429.95%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-132.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-96.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-255.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-96.55%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.77%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.77%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.