PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while SLDP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
140.80%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SLDP's 22.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
242.10%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.19%
Interest expense growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.31%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of SLDP's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.16%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-578.49%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-376.28%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-376.28%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
100.00%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.05%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
34.05%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.