PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-53.88%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-98.83%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-6.32%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
103.11%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
382.46%
R&D growth while SLDP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-3.07%
G&A reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
86.35%
Marketing expense change of 86.35% while SLDP maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.82%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SLDP's 22.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-40.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-21.12%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-55.77%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
263.91%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
455.37%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
118.21%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
139.49%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
104.68%
Other expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
106.57%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
114.24%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
106.57%
Tax expense change of 106.57% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.49%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
60.93%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.