PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.00%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2828.28%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-57.72%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-47.15%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-40.68%
G&A reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-415.16%
Marketing expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-79.83%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 22.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.88%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-48.15%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.88%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
219.28%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
299.10%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-544.67%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-655.84%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
824.39%
Other expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
294.31%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
392.88%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
294.31%
Tax expense change of 294.31% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
487.94%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
634.93%
Net margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
234.62%
EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
280.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
74.90%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
58.90%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.