PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.36%
Revenue growth 50-75% of SLDP's 7.80%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-5.97%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
15.75%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.86%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.08%
G&A reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-47.53%
Marketing expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.28%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 22.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.41%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-95.57%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
118.15%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-108.48%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-108.05%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
34.85%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
38.17%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-73.12%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-89.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-90.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-89.84%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
69.26%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
46.43%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.