PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
27.60%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
62.36%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
1.69%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-20.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
25.51%
R&D growth while SLDP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
17.42%
G&A change of 17.42% while SLDP maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-22.73%
Marketing expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.39%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 22.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
48.37%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.57%
Interest expense growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.28%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-85.01%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.99%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-46.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.02%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.10%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-325.04%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-276.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-325.04%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.15%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.15%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.