0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-100.00%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense change of 100.00% while SLDP maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 22.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
100.00%
Similar EBITDA growth to SLDP's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
100.00%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to SLDP's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
100.00%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
100.00%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Tax expense change of 100.00% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
100.00%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Net margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.