PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.10%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
21.60%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.36%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-7.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.46%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
5.14%
G&A change of 5.14% while SLDP maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
128.42%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SLDP's 22.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
32.31%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
130.23%
Interest expense growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.27%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-224.28%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-184.21%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.32%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-128.87%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-101.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-77.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.90%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-109.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-83.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
24.12%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.12%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.