PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.91%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.68%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-5.14%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.79%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
2.54%
G&A change of 2.54% while SLDP maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-4.34%
Marketing expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.99%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 22.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.63%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-2.56%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-16.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-129.18%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-130.37%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-174.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-186.11%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.13%
Other expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-501.03%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-525.51%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-53.45%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-187.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-198.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-300.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-300.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.