PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
12.48%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
6.23%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
18.99%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.79%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-94.74%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
5.69%
G&A change of 5.69% while SLDP maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
24.47%
Marketing expense change of 24.47% while SLDP maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.72%
Similar operating expenses growth to SLDP's 22.17%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
8.85%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.67%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-59.31%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
118.70%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
116.62%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
70.35%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
73.64%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1173.03%
Other expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
107.86%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
106.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
113.35%
Tax expense change of 113.35% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
107.71%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
106.86%
Net margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.12%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
82.12%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.