PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.76%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.58%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
1.59%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.66%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.30%
R&D growth while SLDP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-1.72%
G&A reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-4.72%
Marketing expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.56%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 22.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.26%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.62%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-12.43%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-62.15%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.26%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
59.24%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.21%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-70.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-113.45%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-483.62%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-96.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-96.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.93%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.93%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.