PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.00%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
9.32%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.77%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.23%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 22.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.29%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.50%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
80.14%
Similar EBITDA growth to SLDP's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
81.78%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to SLDP's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
75.69%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
77.70%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
98.33%
Other expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
78.01%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.83%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-70.41%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
77.97%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
79.78%
Net margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.67%
Diluted EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.77%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.28%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.