PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1725.48%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
276.83%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
2308.06%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
220.96%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-50.09%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
160.00%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SLDP's 22.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
186.42%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1707.76%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
56.55%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of SLDP's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
97.62%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to SLDP's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
51.14%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
97.32%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-450.77%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
37.57%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.58%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
52.75%
Tax expense change of 52.75% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
37.21%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
96.56%
Net margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.82%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.99%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.