PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
70.19%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
75.05%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
67.89%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.07%
R&D growth while SLDP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.44%
Similar operating expenses growth to SLDP's 22.17%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
35.28%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.17%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
435.90%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
297.37%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
387.16%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
268.73%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
89.11%
Other expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
346.47%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
244.82%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1380.18%
Tax expense change of 1380.18% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
329.78%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
235.01%
Net margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
300.00%
EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
300.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.29%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
41.42%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.