PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.18%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
13.05%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-35.15%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.02%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.47%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 22.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.64%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.72%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.05%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
21.20%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SLDP's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.94%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
621.29%
Other expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-73.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-67.81%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.17%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-74.84%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-68.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.50%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-18.24%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.