PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.34%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
-26.28%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
41.98%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
28.67%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
100.04%
R&D growth while SLDP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.65%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SLDP's 22.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.21%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.76%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-153.95%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-148.89%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-161.22%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-155.48%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
895.41%
Other expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-73.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-76.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.63%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-79.96%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
66.97%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.89%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.